On Break

11/16/2008

BMB On Break

It’s time again for a little BMB R&R, especially with the market behaving as bizarrely as it’s been. Maybe if we stop watching it start to behave a little better…

Posting will be very light and variable over the course of this week, but we’ll put up an open thread each market day for our readers to comment on the day’s market activity or to post any interesting links they might run across.

Check the space below for whatever the latest might be during this ‘off’ time, and please visit the various sites in the ‘Links’ and ‘Regular Stops’ for up-to-date market news and analysis.

BMB will be back in full swing by next weekend.

Posted: 1:00 pm

4/8/2008

Volcker Speaks

…in somewhat unflattering terms about his successors at the Federal Reserve:

Update:  CR now has a link to the video of Volcker’s speech.

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker questioned the central bank’s decision to rescue Bear Stearns Cos. with a $29 billion loan, saying it was at “the very edge” of its legal authority.

“The Federal Reserve has judged it necessary to take actions that extend to the very edge of its lawful and implied powers, transcending in the process certain long-embedded central banking principles and practices,” Volcker said in a speech to the Economic Club of New York.

Volcker, the Fed chairman from 1979 to 1987, had implicit criticism for U.S. regulators and market participants who allowed “excesses of subprime mortgages” to spread into “the mother of all crises.” The Fed’s Bear Stearns loan was unusual, he said.

“What appears to be in substance a direct transfer of mortgage and mortgage-backed securities of questionable pedigree from an investment bank to the Federal Reserve seems to test the time-honored central bank mantra in time of crisis: lend freely at high rates against good collateral; test it to the point of no return,” he said.

Volcker said the Fed’s loan may send investors the wrong message.

“The extension of lending directly to non-banking financial institutions — while under the authority of nominally `temporary’ emergency powers — will surely be interpreted as an implied promise of similar action in times of future turmoil,” he said.

Volcker said the modern financial system has “failed the test” of the marketplace. When asked whether he predicts a “dollar crisis,” he said, “you don’t have to predict it, you’re in it.”

“The bright new financial system, with all its talented participants, with all its rich rewards, has failed the test of the marketplace,” Volcker said.

“The implications of these decisions, and the lessons from the unfolding crisis itself, surely deserve full debate and legislative review in the period ahead,” Volcker said.

Volcker, 80, said the problems stemmed in part from trading of increasing complicated securities including derivatives that “have taking on a trading life of their own,” and said the turmoil “adds up to a clarion call for an effective response.”

`There was no pressure for change, not in Washington which was spending money and keeping taxes low, not on Wall Street which was wallowing in money, not on Main Street with individuals enjoying easy credit and rising house prices,” Volcker said.

Pointer from Calculated Risk.

Somewhat fitting that on this same day, Greenspan is on CNBC, live after the market close, trying to convince the world that none of this is his fault.

Posted: 3:57 pm

Chart Chatter

TRAN chart Despite $100+ oil and collapsing airlines, the DJ Transports has held up much better than the broader-based indices. Don’t ask me why.

Update:   The Transports might struggle a bit tomorrow on UPS’s warning after the bell.
BKX chart The banks get a pop every time the Fed talks about new handouts or some bank gets tossed yet another lifeline, but that hasn’t translated into any real strength.
GRMN chart Oh, how the mighty have fallen.

 

Charts courtesy of StockCharts.com

Posted: 3:33 pm

Market Wrap

Good thing there’s a closing bell. Something had to wake me up so I could get the wrap done.

In a word - boring. Very boring. An early dip, some floppin’ around, another dip after the Fed minutes, and more choppin’ into the close.

Dow Industrials 12576.44 -35.99 -0.29%
S&P 500 1365.54 -7.00 -0.51%
Nasdaq Comp. 2348.76 -16.07 -0.68%
Russell 2000 711.92 -0.76 -0.11%
NYSE Comp. 9150.63 -34.09 -0.37%
Nasdaq 100 1846.14 -14.69 -0.79%
Dow Transports 4978.40 -9.67 -0.19%
Dow Utilities 500.12 +1.70 +0.34%

Treasuries, like stocks, were pretty quiet, so yields were near unchanged:
6-month: 1.56%    2-yr: 1.87%    5-yr: 2.72%    10-yr: 3.56%    30-yr: 4.38%.

Internals were a little weaker than you might think when looking at the final ’scores’, though volume backed off just slightly from yesterday’s levels. Advances/declines were about 8 to 11 on both exchanges, with up/down volume 2 to 3 on the NYSE and 7 to 13 on the Nasdaq. New highs/lows played the same game we’ve been seeing, better on the NYSE than the Nasdaq. Highs/lows were 33/13 on the NYSE but 15/56 on the Nasdaq.

The group picture was a bit weaker than the indices might indicate as well. There were a few winners, but there were also quite a few groups that dropped more than a percent. Leading the green team were the metals (+2.1%), HMOs (+1.7%), natural gas stocks (+1.6%), paper (+1.4%), steel (+1.3%) and hospitals (+1.0%). On the losing side of the page were the homebuilders (-2.8%), semiconductors (-2.8%), banks (-2.2%), insurance (-1.4%), REITs (-1.4%), computer tech (-1.3%), drugs (-1.2%), brokers (-1.2%), disk drives (-1.2%) and gold and silver stocks (-1.1%).

Energy prices slipped back a bit, with crude ‘falling’ to $108.50/barrel, gasoline losing a couple of cents to $2.76/gallon, and natural gas giving up nine cents to $9.71/mmBTU. The dollar index went nowhere, still at 72.22. Gold fell seven bucks to $915/ounce, and dropped back to $17.67/ounce.

BMB Note:   We’ve been waiting for some ‘follow-through’ to the big day of last week - and we’re still waiting.

Geez, not a lot talk about today, especially in the indices. The majors have been unable to make any significant progress for five straight days now as they bump into overhead resistance. But on the good side, they’re still holding the lows of last week.

Some of the metals stocks that had run into a wall yesterday perked back up a little today, but that was hardly anything earth-shattering. On the negative side, the happy homebuilders took a hit today, and the semiconductors, that had made a nice move up off the lows, got smacked back down. And the banks, well, without any more news of ’saving graces’ from the Fed (or anyone else), have been leaking their way back down again.

I see very little reason to get excited about this market, on either side, until I see a few others getting more excited than they have appeared lately. I’ll wait for the market to decide what it’s going to do next. Obviously, it’s having a heck of a time trying to make up its mind. Maybe this is a consolidation period before another break higher, or maybe the resistance will prove too strong and things will start to weaken again underneath the surface.

Posted: 3:22 pm

I’ll Take It

I’m not sure why anyone would be selling gold in this environment - other than to push the price down:

The International Monetary Fund said it would sell more than 14.2 million ounces of gold, currently valued at more than $13 billion, and cut substantial costs as part of an efficiency drive.

The news helped pressure the price of gold Tuesday on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The benchmark futures contract for gold traded recently at $917.80 an ounce, down $9.10, or 1%.

Posted: 2:11 pm

Love and Hate

Banks still hate each other, but consumers are lovin’ their credit cards.

A couple of excerpts from today’s Five Things:

1.  Banks Still Hate Each Other

OK, here’s the crucial issue the market will begin to discover next quarter: Despite the return of Depression-era monetary policies aimed at relieving the debt crisis, banks still hate each other. 

An article on Bloomberg this morning looks at the basic problem. Banks such as Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC) and even Wells Fargo (WFC) - the best apple in the rather large basket of rotten apples - are facing their lowest capital ratios in years. The net result is that despite record attempts by the Federal Reserve to provide banks with liquidity, that money is not making it past the banks’ balance sheets.

The Bloomberg article, “Citigroup, Wells Fargo May Loan Less After Downgrades,” focuses on credit rating downgrades, but what you need to know is that the combination of bad debt, risk aversion and a growing avalanche of government regulation will by next year have effectively dismantled the banking industry as we now know it.

What does that mean for you? Why should you care? If you’re an entrepreneur it means you are going to need to be more creative in financing your business. If you’re an investor it means you need to stop staring at the tickers of the financial engine companies - basically any company whose business involves relying on credit creation, and the slicing and dicing of credit into smaller, more leveraged parts - and replace those tickers with companies that make things people need.

That sounds much easier than it is. If you look closely at companies today in just about any industry you may be surprised to find the extent to which their business model is in some way reliant on credit creation (Like Dell, perhaps? - BMB). The market will be surprised to discover this too, probably sometime next quarter. There are still good companies out there, companies that make money by producing things that people need, but they are increasingly harder to find.

3.  Consumers Smoke ‘Em If They Got ‘Em

Not cigarettes. Credit cards. Consumers are, quite literally, smoking ‘em. Consumer credit numbers released by the Federal Reserve late yesterday afternoon showed consumers took down $5.16 billion in February. 

The news reports quickly herded toward presenting this as a “less-than-expected” figure, indicative of consumer credit growth slowing. Sure enough, on the face of it this would appear to be true. But there’s a darker reality hiding behind the face of the numbers. Simply put, consumers are cutting back on the use of credit for purchases of big-ticket items such as cars, major appliances and boats, and ramping up their use of credit for smaller necessity items.

Compare the numbers. Non-revolving credit, the type of closed-end loans used for major purchases, rose by $497 million. Revolving credit, credit cards, rose by a staggering $4.66 billion, or 5.9%.  

Posted: 12:51 pm

Midday Market

Snooze-a-rooni.

Is today some sort of holiday that nobody told me about?

Posted: 11:55 am

Band Aids

More comments on the Fed and the current situation in the US from Jim Rogers in a Money Morning interview:

The U.S. dollar is a terribly flawed currency. I’m trying to get all of my money out of U.S. dollars. I don’t know why anybody would put money into the U.S. dollar, and by extension into the U.S., as we stand here today. The U.S. is probably the largest debtor nation the world has ever seen!

The United States’ foreign debts are increasing at the rate of $1 trillion U.S. dollars every 15 months. U.S. foreign debt is over $13 trillion, and rising rapidly. It’s the official policy of the central bank to debase the currency. They’re trying to drive down the value of the dollar.

Q: The government has succeeded wildly, so far.

Rogers: You haven’t seen anything yet!

They’re trying to drive down the dollar. I’m trying to be patriotic. I’m trying to sell dollars. That’s what they want. I’m trying to help them drive down the value of the currency.

All Americans should. There are certainly probably good reasons to put some money in dollars. For instance, if you have to buy cotton, you have to have dollars.

But for the most part - I, anyway - am joining other people who’re trying to avoid the U.S. dollar, because Washington has sent a very clear signal: “We want the dollar to decline. We’re gonna do our best to make it decline.”

Well, everybody has to make their own decision. I’m trying to do what the Federal Reserve wants me to do, and I’m selling dollars.

Q: My take is that former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan and current Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke may go down as the worst central bank chairmen in history. Do you see it differently?

Rogers: [Bernanke] and Greenspan together will probably bring [about] the end of the Federal Reserve. We’ve had two central banks in America that failed. This third central bank will probably fail, too, because of Bernanke and Greenspan.

The Federal Reserve last week put $200 billion more onto its balance sheet of mortgages. Now I don’t know how big they can expand their balance sheet, but if they keep doing it, there’s only so much - [and] they just bought Bear Stearns.

There’s just so much they can do. Maybe that balance sheet is infinite. I doubt it. And it can be said to be infinite; they just print money like Zimbabwe or someplace. But that has to come to an end, eventually.

Maybe Bernanke is going to get into his helicopter and fly around collecting rents now. Maybe when they repossess all the property, he’s going to be the rent collector. But then when they eventually take on all the car loans, I guess he’s going to be collecting car payments, too. And credit card debt, when they take over all the credit card payments, I guess he’ll be hauling us all out saying: “Your credit card’s overdue.”

This is insanity.

Q: Is there a circumstance under which you could see the U.S. recovering, or do you think this country is doomed to be an economic also-ran?

Rogers: Historically, nations that have gotten themselves into this kind of situation have only gotten out following a crisis or a semi-crisis, or some gigantic stroke of luck.

The U.K. got out because they discovered the North Sea. Now you give me the largest oil field in the world, or one of the largest oil fields in the world, I’ll show you a good time, too.

So if you have a stroke of luck [you can escape these kinds of problems], but otherwise, nobody’s ever sorted out these problems without some kind of gigantic crisis or semi-crisis first.

In America, most people do not understand there is a problem! The few who know there’s something going on don’t understand what it is. Most of them who understand it actually think it’s good that the currency’s declining. America’s not going to do anything until things get very, very bad.

Others that offer the rejoinder to this - that the declining dollar makes America competitive - [that] has worked in the short term. But no country has ever restored itself by debasing its currency, not in the long term, not even the medium term.

Many places have tried to debase their currency as a solution. It’s never worked, other than maybe in the short-term, for a while.

Q: Are we looking at a Japanese-style lost economic decade?

Rogers: The Federal Reserve is making the same mistakes that the Japanese made. They’re trying to say: “We won’t let anybody fail. We’ll print a lot of money. We’ll drive interest rates to zero. And we don’t want anybody to fail. We’ll put on as many Band-Aids as we have to.”

Well, putting Band-Aids on a cancer patient is not a good solution.

So whether it’s like the ’90s in Japan, or the ’70s in America, remains to be seen.

[One-time U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman] Arthur Burns, who headed the central bank in the ’70s, did exactly what Bernanke’s doing. He raced in and printed money and said: “Oh, everything’s gonna be OK.”

But the economy never recovered, inflation went through the roof, and the dollar was under duress. Eventually they had to bring in Paul Volcker and interest rates went over 20%. And eventually they killed inflation and they solved the problem.

They’re making exactly the same mistakes that Burns made. For whatever reason, though, this problem is going to last longer than previous difficulties in America. And it’s probably going to be worse.

Because, now, America is a debtor nation. Now we’re the largest debtor nation in the world. At least in the ’70s, we were still a creditor nation. Japan could survive because they were the largest creditor in the world at the time. So they didn’t fall off the face of the earth.

America’s now the largest debtor the world has ever seen. What’s happening in the U.S. is not going to be fun.

Hat tip to Seeking Alpha.

Posted: 11:40 am

Pending Home Sales

Barry isn’t very impressed with the NAR’s spin machine:

I see that the NAR has hired Crackhead Bob as their new headline writer, to wit: Existing-Home
Sales to Stablize Before Upturn in Second Half of 2008
.

In a moment, we will discuss how the NAR managed to get their forecast exactly backwards. Meanwhile, let’s look at the actual index:

“The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in February, slipped 1.9 percent to 84.6 from an upwardly revised reading of 86.2 in January, and was 21.4 percent lower than the February 2007 index of 107.6.  “The slip in pending home sales implies we’re not out of the woods yet, though an era of successive deep sales declines appears to be over,” Yun said.

Clueless.

…you have to be a drug abuser to believe a 21.4% drop in the year-over-year index is a sign of stability.

“Stablize”. Not only are the realtors lousy forecasters, they’re not real good at spelling either.

Posted: 10:24 am

Early Take

Hmm. Not a heck of a lot going on yet. The indices slipped a bit at the open and are still hanging a bit in the red, and A/D lines are also negative. The groups are mostly red, with homebuilders, semiconductors, gold and silver stocks, drug stocks, telecom and banks leading the losers, while HMOs, metals and hospitals are showing gains.

Treasuries are flat to slightly higher. Energy prices are a little lower. The dollar index, after dipping overnight, is back up around the levels of yesterday. Gold and silver are lower.

Posted: 10:18 am

More Cautious

Deron Wagner on current market conditions:

The S&P 500 is already showing a gain of 3.7% in the first week of April, but remember the entire gain occurred on just one day (April 1). Since then, the broad market has done nothing other than chop around in the vicinity of its April 1 high. While this consolidation is indeed bullish, stocks must now prove they are capable of following through on the breakout above key resistance levels that occurred last week. The bulls still have the upper hand in the short-term, but the fact that intraday rallies have failed in each of the past two afternoons makes us more cautious. Although the market has not given us any reason to enter new short positions, it may be wise to tighten stops on existing long positions. When last week’s rally confirms itself by stocks closing at new near-term highs, we’ll be more confident about staying on the long side of the market in the intermediate-term.

Posted: 8:43 am