On Break

11/16/2008

BMB On Break

It’s time again for a little BMB R&R, especially with the market behaving as bizarrely as it’s been. Maybe if we stop watching it start to behave a little better…

Posting will be very light and variable over the course of this week, but we’ll put up an open thread each market day for our readers to comment on the day’s market activity or to post any interesting links they might run across.

Check the space below for whatever the latest might be during this ‘off’ time, and please visit the various sites in the ‘Links’ and ‘Regular Stops’ for up-to-date market news and analysis.

BMB will be back in full swing by next weekend.

Posted: 1:00 pm

4/12/2008

Goin’ Down

From Mish’s site:

The Largest U.S. Municipal Bankruptcy Looms in Alabama. What caused this mess is an interest rate swap Jefferson County officials entered into when they financed a $3.2 billion sewer cleanup. For weeks county officials claimed they would work things out, but that is increasingly unlikely. Let’s pick up the story from Bloomberg.

Talks on the sewer system’s debt crisis aren’t making progress, increasing the odds that the county will file municipal bankruptcy, Jefferson County Commission President Bettye Fine Collins said Tuesday.

This is how it ends for the little county that was going to teach America how to use interest-rate swaps. The Jefferson County bankruptcy, if it comes, and it’s hard to see how it can be avoided, will eclipse that of the 1994 filing by Orange County, California. Derivatives are at the center of both death-spirals.

Jefferson County played the derivatives game as part of financing a $3.2 billion sewer cleanup. The county engaged in a batch of interest-rate swaps with the banks that helped underwrite the debt, in a strategy designed to save the county and its taxpayers some money. The strategy backfired, demonstrating the speculative, risky nature of swaps.

Jefferson County failed to post $184 million in collateral in early March and has been in technical default since then. JP Morgan and other investment banks are on the other side of the swaps.

The investment banks want Jefferson county to raise taxes to cover its obligations. Jefferson County wants the Wall Street brokers to renegotiate the swaps and insists it will not raise taxes.

“We are dealing with a virtual immovable force on Wall Street” the Birmingham News quoted Jefferson County Commission President Bettye Fine Collins as saying.

According to Joe Mysak at Bloomberg, the SEC is investigating this deal as part of a larger probe into the reinvestment-of-proceeds business across the municipal market in general. “This has been going on for years, but there are signs it will erupt with a barrage of criminal prosecutions.

Mysak goes on to say “The stock-market guys say you have to reach a bottom before you can recover, and that a bottom is often signaled by the collapse of some big entity. Many people thought it was Bear Stearns Cos. In reality, it’s Jefferson County.

On that I say “No Chance”. There are $45 trillion credit default swaps, and over $500 trillion total derivatives, so expecting a default on tiny deal of $3.2 billion to mark any sort of bottom is strikingly Pollyannaish.

Posted: 7:36 pm

Lunacy

In this week’s Credit Bubble Bulletin, Doug Noland examines “The Greenspan Episode”:

…Mr. Greenspan was the undisputed governor, architect - the promulgator of what will be recognized as an epic failure in central banking. After all, he was for almost 18 years the appointed guardian over a financial system that perpetrated the greatest Credit and speculative excess in history. He dominated monetary policy like no other central banker in history. Chairman Greenspan not only negligently failed to act to reign in dangerous excesses, he became a vocal proponent for virtually all aspects of “Wall Street finance.”

Anyone that has read history related to central banking appreciates that Alan Greenspan conveniently made up new rules as he went along. He evolved into the absolute “maestro” at concocting sophisticated rationale for seemingly every troubling development that took root in contemporary (”wildcat”) finance. Greenspan was an outspoken proponent of securities-based finance; of models-based risk management; of the great benefits provided by derivatives markets; of the liquidity benefits of leveraged speculation; of “telegraphed baby-step” monetary management; and a proponent of “risk management”-based monetary management (i.e. ease aggressively to forestall even a low probability of “deflation”). He trumpeted the profound benefits emanating from the capacity for contemporary finance to better quantify, manage and disburse risk - in the process creating a more stable financial sector. Most importantly, he championed the notion that it was preferable for the system to let Credit booms and asset Bubbles run their course - and then to treat their busts aggressively with monetary stimulus to ensure little negative impact the real economy. He claimed Bubbles were only recognizable after the fact.

He evolved into the ultimate activist and micromanaging central banker, wrapped bizarrely in the cloth of a free market ideologue. It was a most precarious amalgamation. On his watch transpired historic ballooning of the government-sponsored enterprises, of Wall Street balance sheets, and of the size, power and influence of the leveraged speculating community. Worse yet, it’s my view that he used these sectors as key inflationary mechanisms. The Greenspan Episode will be seen from a historical perspective as central banking lunacy. It was the exact intoxicant for market participants and politicians to wallow in during a spectacular boom.

Fundamentally, the Federal Reserve “pegged” short-term interest rates, inviting leveraged speculation. I am not of the view that there is a specific interest-rate that is “right” for the system. But exceptionally low rates telegraphed to the leveraged speculating for the purposes of stimulating the acquisition of risk assets and reinflating asset markets is nefarious central banking. And never combine telegraphed “pegged” low interest rates with assurances that the Fed will always be there to sustain marketplace liquidity (underwrite securities prices), while cutting rates aggressively to mitigate bursting Bubbles. Once that path is taken there is no turning back; the central bank is held hostage by the fragility associated with escalating system leverage, speculative excess, and an increasingly maladjusted and vulnerable real economy.

Greenspan now warns against over-zealous regulation and the intrusion of governments into the competitive marketplace. Well, he should have considered these inevitable consequences when he disregarded Credit and asset Bubbles. And to admit to such mistakes to ensure a sounder monetary policy regime going forward would be statesmanlike - which he apparently is not. And while the focus these days is on government programs and regulatory reform, it is my hope that meaningful discussion emerges with regard to a sound “analytical framework” for our central bank.

Posted: 12:25 pm

Weekend Sector Scan

In the longer-term view, not much has changed. A few of the sector SPDRs are still basically sideways over the past six months, and most of those have taken roundabout paths to get there:

 

 

The other sectors are still sagging below where they were six months ago, some worse than others:

 

 

The numbers as the major indices remain rangebound:

 

Sector Symbol 8 Week % Chg. 4 Week % Chg. 1 Week % Chg. YTD % Chg.
Energy XLE +6.4 +3.7 +0.2 -2.3
Basic Materials XLB +4.8 +3.5 -1.7 +1.2
Consumer Staples XLP +1.6 +3.1 -2.0 -3.5
Technology XLK -0.6 +2.9 -2.8 -15.3
Industrials XLI -0.9 +1.0 -5.1 -7.0
Utilities XLU -1.5 +3.6 +0.3 -7.2
Consumer Discretionary XLY -4.1 +2.9 -3.6 -5.5
Health Care XLV -5.4 +2.8 -0.2 -10.7
Financials XLF -6.3 +4.7 -4.7 -13.1

 

Charts courtesy of StockCharts.com

Posted: 9:52 am