On Break

11/16/2008

BMB On Break

It’s time again for a little BMB R&R, especially with the market behaving as bizarrely as it’s been. Maybe if we stop watching it start to behave a little better…

Posting will be very light and variable over the course of this week, but we’ll put up an open thread each market day for our readers to comment on the day’s market activity or to post any interesting links they might run across.

Check the space below for whatever the latest might be during this ‘off’ time, and please visit the various sites in the ‘Links’ and ‘Regular Stops’ for up-to-date market news and analysis.

BMB will be back in full swing by next weekend.

Posted: 1:00 pm

6/7/2008

Black Swan

For those of you that may have missed it earlier in the week, this one was worth a look - the dreaded ‘black swan’. :)

Posted: 7:01 pm

Who’s Playing?

All of the talk in the oil markets has been about those nasty “speculators”. But John Mauldin says this week that maybe those ’speculators’ aren’t the ones fueling the fire:

There was a lot of short covering in the various markets, but especially in oil. But let’s dig deeper.

I have been pondering for a few weeks about whether the long-only commodity index funds are really affecting the markets. Basically, these funds have become a huge part of the commodities market. It is clear that enough buying and in size will affect any market, but these funds do not take delivery. They “roll” their exposure as they get close to expiration, so they are not involved in the spot price. In theory, the spot price should be a function of immediate supply and demand.

But, it is not that simple, as Louis Gave reminded me. Looking at recent CFTC data, investors known as “commercials” were long 827 million barrels of oil. In the early part of the decade it was 3-400 million barrels. Commercials are supposed to be those who are hedging their production of oil. But large oil companies rarely hedge, and smaller producers only hedge a portion of their oil (see more below). Has supply increased over 100%? I think not.

Where is the increase in commercial interest coming from? The clear answer is long-only commodity index funds and ETFs. They simply buy baskets of commodities at whatever the price is, speculating on the rise in the price of the overall commodity market. It is a one-way trade. Jim Rogers is probably the most famous exponent of such trades, but there are scores of funds which mimic what he does. But there are limits to how much exposure speculators can buy, because the CFTC will allow a speculator to only buy so much of any given market, to keep large players from getting a corner on the market and driving up prices, a la the Hunt brothers and silver in 1980. These limits are known as “position limits.”

There are no position limits for commercials who are hedging. They are in theory hedging their physical exposure to a given commodity they are selling or buying. Think of a farmer and General Mills. Both want to lock in the price of wheat so they can plan for the future. Speculators are useful in that they provide liquidity to the markets. In fact, they are essential to a properly functioning market.

The CFTC created a loophole when they allowed investment banks to be classified as commercial investors. So, when a long-only commodity index fund wants to buy a million barrels of oil, they can go to the investment bank, who will sell them a “swap” on the price of oil, and then immediately hedge their exposure in the futures market.

To be sure, the long-only index fund can now create positions far in excess of the position limits that are enforced upon normal speculators. These funds can grow to be huge - multi-tens of billions of dollars. Even though they are speculators, they are not included in the data as speculators. Because they get their exposure from an investment bank, they are ultimately listed as a commercial. In total, they represent an enormous part of the commodities markets. But they are providing liquidity, so what’s the problem? They are not actually hoarding the commodities. The price is still set at the spot price. But.

But that is not the whole story. They are making it difficult, if not dangerous, to short the market. When massive buying comes into the market, it moves the market and sends the signal to the market that prices are rising. Momentum players move in, and prices rise some more.

In fact, as the price of oil has risen from $90 to $100 and higher, normal speculative open interest has declined, as who can afford to fight the tape? At the least, I expect the CFTC to require those “commercials” that are really long-only index funds to provide transparency. Politicians are demanding that something be done. It is entirely possible that they will impose position limits on the long-only funds. As I said last week, when the elephants are dancing, the mice should leave the floor. And Congress and the regulators are very serious elephants indeed. Let’s hope they do whatever they are going to do quickly.

Posted: 12:21 pm

Storm Clouds

As was mentioned in the comments yesterday, it’s starting to feel as if the storm clouds are beginning to build once again.

Doug Noland feels it too:

There were important developments this week that seemed to indicate an important inflection point may have been reached. Energy price instability took a decided turn for the worst; global inflationary concerns ratcheted higher; dollar vulnerability reemerged; financial stocks were crushed; and, importantly, the U.S. Credit system demonstrated its greatest instability in a couple of months. And while the U.S. Bubble Economy has proved relatively resilient thus far, sinking stock prices and a further tightening of Financial Conditions would at this point prove too much to bear. I’ll also venture a presumption that all the excitement - along with the unwind of hedges - instigated by the Fed’s bailouts could now be a source of added instability. Rampant speculation has taken hold and will remain well-embedded until the bust.

To be sure, there are huge costs associated with endeavors to sustain a Bubble Economy. Some are now readily apparent.

Posted: 12:08 pm

Weekend Sector Scan

A pretty messy week for the indices, but the sector picture didn’t change a great deal.

Energy and Materials remain the only sectors that are in the green for the year:

 

 

If you’ve been paying attention at all, you know the Financials are leaking again. And Health Care, well, it’s just sitting there. Still.

 

 

As for the rest, the Industrials and Discretionaries are the shakiest at the moment:

 

 

Here are the numbers as the indices start to shake, rattle and - possibly - roll over:

 

Sector Symbol 8 Week % Chg. 4 Week % Chg. 1 Week % Chg. YTD % Chg.
Energy XLE +11.0 +1.5 0.0 +8.4
Technology XLK +9.4 +0.9 -2.5 -7.3
Basic Materials XLB +4.7 +1.7 -0.8 +5.9
Utilities XLU +3.2 +1.2 -1.9 -4.2
Industrials XLI +1.6 -3.2 -4.7 -5.5
Consumer Discretionary XLY +1.1 -2.9 -3.2 -4.4
Consumer Staples XLP +0.6 +0.4 -1.9 -3.0
Health Care XLV -0.3 -0.2 -2.1 -11.0
Financials XLF -7.2 -10.2 -5.8 -19.4

 

Charts courtesy of StockCharts.com

Posted: 9:44 am