7/16/2008

Idiots Fiddle

This commentary from Barry at The Big Picture was simply too good to excerpt, so you’re getting the whole thing:

Idiots Fiddle While Rome Burns

The collection of ne’er do wells, clueless dolts, political hacks, and oh, let’s just be blunt and call them what they are — total Idiots — expands into an ever larger circle.

While the Republic burns due to the unsavory combination of incompetence, ideological rigidity, and crony capitalism, the fools and assclowns seem ever more determined to avoid any personal responsibility for the damages they have wrought. Instead, they flail about blindly, blaming everything and everyone — except their own horrific negligence.

This is financial incompetence writ on a scale grander than anything seen for centuries.

As a nation, our institutions have failed us: Under Alan Greenspan, the Federal Reserve slept through the most reckless and irresponsible expansion of bank lending in history for reasons of ideological purity.

There is a choice to be made: Either regulate the Banks, or leave it to the vagaries of the free markets to punish those who trade with, or place their assets in the wrong institutions. But for God’s sake, do not give us the worst of both worlds — do not allow banks the freedom to make horrific but preventable mistakes (i.e., only lending money to those who can pay it back), but then expect the taxpayers to foot the trillion dollar bill. 

That’s not capitalism, its not socialism, its not regulation, and its sure as hell isn’t what free markets are. Our language is insufficient to describe this hodge-podge system, other than to call it a random patchwork of quasi-capitalism, quadrennial-socialism, and politics as usual. Ideological idiocy is the only phrase I can muster that has any resonance with the daily insanity.

We have entered into a fit of Orwellian madness: The American Capitalists, long the globe’s leading advocates for free markets, have become near Socialists. Halfway around the world, the Chinese Communists have picked up the baton, and are moving rapidly towards a form of Capitalism. Ironically, it is the once largest communist nations — the Chinese and the Russians — who holds much of Fannie and Freddie’s paper.

Hey comrades, who’s selling the rope to whom?

Perhaps the rescue of “Phony and Fraudy” are not so much a bail out of American homeowners as it is a desperate attempt to stay in the good graces of our friendly global bankers. We are the world’s largest debtor nation, and as such, we depend upon the kindness of strangers — be they Japanese or Europeans or Abu Dhabians — or even former communists.

Back in the States, something beyond cognitive dissonance is occurring — this is full blown case of dementia unfolding in the public sphere. When this era of excess and absurdity is treated by historians in the future, the question I expect to be asked most is not why many of these people weren’t jailed for their financial felonies. Rather, I expect them to wonder why so many of these folk weren’t placed in protective custody, and heavily medicated, for the only rational explanation for their statements and behaviors is that they have gone so far beyond the bend as to be completely and totally insane.

Massively over-leveraged companies? Blame the short sellers.

Wildly undercapitalized finacial firms? Blame the rumors.

Heinously poor corporate management? Blame a Senator.

Books will be written about this period of time, and our descendants will wonder in awe as to how this was allowed to happen. Tulips got nothing on us! Its not just the total dollar value of the losses that have exceeded all other global fits of financial madness combined, but rather, how so many warning signs were so blithely ignored by so many and for so long. What was wrong with these people, the authors and historians will wonder. Did the antibiotics in the food supply drive them mad? Did the High Fructose Corn Syrup compromise their ability to think? Some form of viral plague? Road rage? What else could have created such a mass delusion amongst not just the populace, but their leadership and institutions?   

Indy Mac goes belly up, having lost $900 million this year alone. Its shares fell 87% in 2007 and then its value dropped (on top of last year’s collapse) another 95% this year-to-date. The stock fell to 28 cents yesterday. Some estimates of the total bad loans made by this somewhere in the neighborhood of $30 billion dollars — and the Office of Thrift Supervision blames a senator who is investigating how much of the FDIC’s $53 Billion this is going to eat up, with Wall Street estimates ranging from 15% to 30%. The towering incompetence of OTS is incomprehendable, but it is their colossal gall that is truly stupefying.

From beyond the grave, Adam Smith does not know whether to weep or wretch.

Posted: 6:45 am

6 Comments »

  1. Wow. Well-said. Well-written.

    Comment by Maria — 7/16/2008 @ 12:27 pm

  2. Was just reading this a little while ago. Look at the comments in Barry’s post, another sign of many Americans’ disaffection from our country’s “leadership” and their insane policies.

    By the way, was reading in the FT today about the SEC’s latest stance against naked shorting in shares of financials and GSEs. Like others posting at The Big Picture, I had to laugh.

    We’ve been hearing about problems with naked shorting for several years now, with not much done about it as far as I can tell. All of a sudden the SEC and Cox are in a bind over the practice now that Fannie and Freddie are the perceived targets of the same practice.

    Comment by David — 7/16/2008 @ 3:03 pm

  3. And the SEC is threatening to go after the ‘rumor mongers’ that push stocks down too. No mention at all of the rumors that send stocks up - takeover rumors, Warren Buffett buying into Bear Stearns, rumors of Fed action… If it pushes stocks up and buries the shorts, that’s ok.

    Comment by BMB — 7/16/2008 @ 3:34 pm

  4. I agree, and this theme of the “one-sided negative argument” has been present in almost everything these days (”good” speculation vs. “bad”, “helpful rumors” vs. “bad” rumors, index funds blamed for driving commodities higher while stock index funds are lauded as the savior of the individual investor, etc.)

    Interesting thing about naked shorting is that I’ve never fully understood the mechanics of this process but it’s ones of those issues you keep running to. Just finished listening to Jim Chanos and Harvey Pitt debate this on Bloomberg, and am reading more about it now.

    Chanos said he was puzzled by the list of supposed naked shorting targets drawn up by SEC. He noted that the companies on Cox’s “emergency” list were all large, liquid banks and that there was no evidence of naked shorting or a high number of failed-to-deliver shares in any of these names.

    He also offered the view that the vast majority of the naked shorting/failure-to-deliver was a problem of Prime Brokerage record keeping and not an intended go-around/infraction by hedge funds looking to short illegaly. But I’ve seen that some people are (understandably) unwilling to buy this “honest mistake” argument.

    Comment by David — 7/16/2008 @ 5:45 pm

  5. Personally I think the whole “go after naked shorts” is just noise. They want to pretend they are doing something. True naked shorts where there aren’t borrowed shares is already illegal–and so if they found a lot of it happening and went after it, okay, news. But all these headlines *imply* that naked shorting is somehow completely responsible for some stock’s heavy decline–ie “Don’t worry there are really great companies and how dare naked shorts cause this problem.”

    It’s smoke and mirrors.

    Comment by Maria — 7/16/2008 @ 5:49 pm

  6. An interesting list of the firms that will benefit from the new rules from Mr. Practical - all financials.

    There’s also been a lot of discussion at Financial Sense about how naked short selling has affected the stocks of many of the junior gold miners.

    Comment by BMB — 7/16/2008 @ 5:59 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. Trackback URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  (Not required, not displayed)