Stimulus?
Or just a bunch of pork?
This week the House is expected to pass an $825 billion economic stimulus package. In reality, this bill is just an escalation of a government-created economic mess. As before, a sense of urgency and impending doom is being used to extract mountains of money from Congress with minimal debate. So much for change. This is déjà vu. We are again being promised that its passage will help employment, help homeowners, help the environment, etc. These promises are worthless. This time around especially, Congress should know better than to pass anything of this magnitude without first reading the fine print. There a many red flags that I have found in this bill.
At least $4 billion is allocated to expanding the police state and the war on drugs through Byrne grants, which even the Bush administration opposed, and the COPS program, both of which are corrupt and largely ineffective programs.
To help Big Brother keep a better eye on us and our children, $20 billion would go towards health information technology, which would create a national system of electronic medical records without adequate privacy protection. These records would instead be subject to the misnamed federal “medical privacy” rule, which allows government and state-favored special interests to see medical records at will. An additional $250 million is allocated for states to nationalize individual student data, expanding Federal control of education and eroding privacy.
$79 billion bails out states that haphazardly expanded their budgets during the bubble years, but refuse to retrench and cut back, as their taxpayers have had to, during recession years.
$200 million expands Americorps. $100 million goes to “faith-and-community” based organizations for social services, which will further insinuate the government into charity and community service. Private charities are much more efficient and effective because they are directly accountable to donors, while public programs tend to get rewarded for failure. With its money, the Federal Government brings its incompetence and its whims, while creating foolish dependence. This is sad to see.
Of course the bill is rife with central planning projects. $4 billion for job training, much of which will be used to direct workers into “green jobs”. $200 million to “encourage” electric cars, $2 billion to support US manufacturers of advanced batteries and battery systems, which is yet another function of government I can’t find in the Constitution. Not to mention $500 million for energy efficient manufacturing demonstration projects, $70 million for a Technology Innovation Program for “research in potentially revolutionary technologies” in which government, not supply and demand, will pick winners and losers. $746 million for afterschool snacks, $6.75 billion for the Department of Commerce, including $1 billion for a census.
This bill delivers an additional debt burden of $6,700 to every American man, woman and child.
There is a lot of stimulus and growth in this bill – that is, of government. Nothing in this bill stimulates the freedom and prosperity of the American people. Politician-directed spending is never as successful as market-driven investment. Instead of passing this bill, Congress should get out of the way by cutting taxes, cutting spending, and reining in the reckless monetary policy of the Federal Reserve.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. Trackback URI
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Ron Paul’s comments on the stimulus bill (HR-1) gives us just enough of a thumbnail sketch to know we must utterly reject this as a ’solution’ to the nation’s economic troubles. A good bit more detail on the bill can be found on the opencongress.org website also.
Since the House will vote on this bill on Wednesday Jan 28, it seems the administration has more than one reason to rush the bill through. Its likely to pass before many of us actually have a chance to read and evaluate it on possible merits and faults and also communicate to our represantatives the dissatisfaction many of us have in principal to such a bill. After all, we’re only going to be paying for this bill for the next several decades! Perhaps by that time the US Treasury will have decided they must simply print whatever money they need – once it can no longer be wrung out of the exhausted taxpayer. HR1 is certain to be the first of a number of very similar costly and foolish stimulus programs…
If HR1 passes we by default opt for a future that will be known for the increases in all forms of taxes brought upon us. This will include capital gains taxes, increased fuel taxes and new federal, state and local taxes on every social amenity and service, raising our cost of living through use and consumption and regulatory fees of every kind.
And when this plan fails miserably to bring about any solution to the fiscal crisis, we will see high unemployment, and global economic stresses that could bring about new international currency and trade wars. We only need to look to our closest neighbor Canada, an over-regulated, over-taxed socialist nation in order to grasp just what the US may eventually be modeled after. For example I see regulatory fees charged by each of the additional numerous State and Federal agencies that will be required to oversee our new life in an era of carbon neutrality that is certain to come.
How many of us will look back and see that our principal mistake was to have allowed an essentially bankrupt and unrestrained US government to interfere in this crisis at all.
Comment by Christian — 1/28/2009 @ 3:15 am
I agree with you Christian, but at this point, I don’t think there’s any stopping it. “And when this plan fails miserably to bring about any solution to the fiscal crisis”, they’ll say it wasn’t “big enough”, and launch a bigger and better Stimulus III and Stimulus IV.
I’m not sure there’s any saving us. The only thing we can do is figure out how to best protect what we have and try to keep it from getting into government’s hands. I wouldn’t put it past them to start raiding savings and retirement accounts to ‘level the playing field’.
We’re not that far away from having a majority of the population that doesn’t pay income taxes — the point of no return. Will that majority ever vote people into office who will start making them pay taxes again? I think not.
Comment by BMB — 1/28/2009 @ 7:25 am